Growth Energy - America's Ethanol Supporters
Install Flash
  • About Growth Energy
    • Intro
    • Structure & Members
      • Leadership & Board of Directors
      • Our Members
    • Membership Options
    • Action Center
      • eTeam
      • Contact Your Leaders
      • Contact The Media
    • Careers
    • Growth Energy FAQ
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Ethanol Issues & Policy
    • Intro
    • Fueling Freedom Plan
      • Background
      • Audio
    • RFS
    • E15
      • E15 Background
      • E15 Fact Sheet
      • E15 Supporting Science
    • Economy
      • VEETC
      • Tariff
    • Energy Security
      • COOL Legislation
    • Environment
    • Performance
      • Ethanol Optimized Engine
    • Myths About Ethanol
      • Food vs. Fuel
        • Food vs. Fuel Talking Points
      • ILUC
        • ILUC Myths & Facts
      • Water Use
  • Ethanol Resource Center
    • Intro
    • Research & Reports
    • Informational Brochures
      • Flipbook Sources & Methodology
    • Growth Energy Websites
  • News & Media Center
    • Intro
    • Press Releases
    • Ethanol In The News
    • Multimedia
    • Blog
    • Events Calendar
    • Advertising
    • For The Press
    • RSS
  • Overview
  • Intro
  • Press Releases
  • Ethanol In The News
  • Multimedia
  • Blog
  • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • For The Press
  • RSS
  • Growth Energy Conferences
  • Member Center Login

April 21, 2010

Study: Wisconsin Would Lose Jobs if Tariff Lapses (Wisconsin Ag Connection)

A University of Missouri study shows that Wisconsin would suffer significant job losses and a severe decline in economic activity if the tariff on foreign-subsidized ethanol is allowed to lapse at the end of the year. The report found that Wisconsin would see job losses of 1,374 in the first year after the tariff lapses, 4,721 in the second year, and 6,972 in the third year. The year-to-year economic declines in Wisconsin would reach $307 million in the first year, $884 million in the second year and $1.2 billion in the third year after the tariff lapses.

The study results were released by Growth Energy, the coalition of U.S. ethanol supporters. Earlier, Growth Energy endorsed legislation introduced by Reps. Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota and John Shimkus from Illinois, which would extend the tariff, as well as the tax credit for cellulosic ethanol production and the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax.

"Rural America would pay a steep price to remove the tariff on foreign-subsidized ethanol," said Growth Energy CEO Tom Buis. This study shows it in stark details. We'd see billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of jobs drain out of the America economy."

Nationally, the study found year-to-year job losses go from 39,506 in the first year after the tariff lapses, to 115,624 in the second year, and 161,384 in the third year. Job losses continue year-after-year and most of these jobs are never regained, according to the 10-year projection performed by the University of Missouri's Community Policy Analysis Center.

The study found that six states would see the largest declines in economic activity due to removal of the ethanol import tariff, including Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, Minnesota, Indiana and South Dakota.

Meanwhile, a separate study....
 

Full article

« Return to previous page

Growth Energy Contact Us RSS Share This +
Visit us on:
Facebook   YouTube   Twitter   Flickr

For more information or to join our mailing list, simply enter your email address:

Name and Email address are required.

You have been added to our email list!